Best AI FinOps Platforms in 2026: 6 Compared
AI FinOps splits two ways: cost tools that read the bill and report spend, and gateways that sit in the request path and stop it. This guide compares six platforms across attribution granularity, in-path enforcement and whether the numbers survive an audit — organized by buyer type, not a fake ranking.
AI FinOps became a line item the day the first seven-figure model bill landed on a CFO's desk. The discipline is the familiar one — attribute spend, allocate it to teams and products, budget it, optimize it — applied to a new and volatile cost driver: tokens across dozens of models and providers, plus the GPU and inference bills underneath them. This guide compares six platforms that do that job, and it separates them on the distinction that actually decides architecture: whether a product reports what you spent or controls what you may spend.
That line runs down the middle of the market. Pure cloud-cost platforms (Vantage, CloudZero) and APM-adjacent tools (Datadog) read billing and usage data and report it with real depth — allocation, unit economics, anomaly detection. Gateway-native platforms (Kosmoy, Portkey, LiteLLM) sit in front of the model and enforce budgets in the request path: the call that blows the budget is refused, not just recorded. Neither family is 'better'; they answer different questions. This guide names which product wins which buyer, cites every competitor claim to that vendor's own material, and is explicit about where Kosmoy is not the deepest tool on the page — because on pure cost optimization, it is not.
This is the AI-cost half of what used to be one guide. The tracing, evaluation and debugging side now lives in a separate comparison; see Best AI Observability Platforms in 2026, and the original combined guide at Best LLM Observability & AI FinOps Platforms in 2026.
What counts as AI FinOps platforms in 2026
What counts as an AI FinOps platform in 2026? At minimum: token-level cost tracking attributed to teams, applications and models; budgets and forecasts; anomaly detection; and some optimization lever — commitment purchasing, routing to cheaper models, or waste elimination. The market divides by where the product sits. Cost-plane tools (Vantage, CloudZero) ingest billing and usage data agentlessly and report it; their strength is breadth and unit economics, and they never touch the request. APM-adjacent tools (Datadog) derive cost from SDK-instrumented telemetry beside the application. Data-path tools (Kosmoy, Portkey, LiteLLM) are gateways: because every call passes through them, their cost numbers are also budgets that can block.
The practical consequence is enforcement. A cost-plane tool can alert you that a runaway job spent $40,000 overnight; a gateway can refuse the request that would have. Both matter — you want the wide-angle optimization view and the in-path brake — but they are not substitutes, and buyers who assume a dashboard will stop spend are surprised when it does not. The second dividing line is whether the cost record is also a governance record: a per-team spend number tied to a registered AI system with an owner and a risk tier is audit evidence; a chargeback report is not.
Adjacent tools worth knowing but not profiled here: the hyperscalers' native cost tools (AWS Cost Explorer, Azure Cost Management) for single-cloud estates, and Kubecost/OpenCost for Kubernetes GPU spend. They cover infrastructure cost well but do not attribute token spend to AI systems or enforce it in the model request path.
How we scored the field
Every product is scored 0–10 on the same ten capability axes. A 10 is reserved for categorical architectural facts; specialists are expected to outscore platforms on their own spoke, and the scores show it.
Observability & FinOps
Cost and usage tracking depth: token-level attribution to team/app/model, unit economics, budgets, forecasts and anomaly detection — the core FinOps job, scored above the vendor's general telemetry.
Gateway & Policy Control
Whether the product sits in the request path and enforces budgets — a call that exceeds a limit is blocked, not merely reported — plus rate limits and per-key controls.
AI Inventory & Discovery
Whether spend is attributed to registered AI systems with owners and risk tiers, versus a cost-only view of which providers incur charges.
Compliance & Audit
Whether cost records double as audit evidence — tied to an owner, a system and a framework (EU AI Act, ISO/IEC 42001, NIST AI RMF) — scored above the vendor's own SOC 2 certificate.
Deployment Sovereignty
Where the cost data lives and what the vendor sees. SaaS-only scores low; self-hosted and air-gap-capable score high; the top score is reserved for no vendor control plane at all.
The field, scored
| Capability (0–10) | Kosmoy | Portkey | LiteLLM | Datadog LLM Observability | Vantage | CloudZero |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI Inventory & Discovery | 9 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 2 |
| Security & Shadow AI | 8 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 1 | 0 |
| Observability & FinOps | 7 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 9 |
| Gateway & Policy Control | 8 | 9 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Guardrails & Runtime Safety | 8 | 8 | 6 | 7 | 0 | 0 |
| Agent Containment | 9 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Compliance & Audit | 9 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 1 |
| Testing, Evals & Red-teaming | 4 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| Agent Building | 6 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Deployment Sovereignty | 10 | 9 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
Bold marks the highest score on each row. 10 is reserved for categorical architectural facts; specialists are expected to outscore platforms on their own spoke.
Capability shape, vendor by vendor
Each panel shows one vendor across the same ten axes. Read it as area: a specialist climbs on its own spoke and falls away on the rest; a platform holds the frontier. The dashed outline is Kosmoy for reference.
The vendors, by buyer type
No single 1-to-N ranking survives contact with a real shortlist — the right pick depends on who is buying. Each vendor below is labeled with the buyer it fits best.
Kosmoy
AI management platformBest for FinOps that must double as audit evidence
A self-hosted control plane for enterprise AI: one inventory, one policy gateway, one audit trail and a containment sandbox for every model, agent and MCP server a company runs.
Kosmoy is the governance-led entry, and the trade is explicit: on pure cost optimization it is not as deep as CloudZero or Vantage — there is no commitment-purchasing automation, no cross-cloud waste remediation, no cost-per-customer unit economics. What it does that a cost dashboard cannot: enforce budgets in the request path. Its cost tracking and budgets sit at a self-hosted gateway spanning LLM, MCP and A2A traffic, so a call that would breach a limit is refused, and the Insights Dashboard attributes spend per team, project, app and model.
The differentiator is that every cost record is tied to a registered AI system with an owner and an EU AI Act risk tier, and it feeds the same event log that produces EU AI Act, ISO/IEC 42001 (aligned) and NIST AI RMF evidence. It runs single-tenant in your own Kubernetes, air-gapped if needed, so the spend data never leaves your perimeter — in production at Italy's central bank and banking regulator and Europe's largest defence and aerospace group. If your FinOps numbers must survive an audit, this is the segment Kosmoy wins; for optimization breadth, buy a cost platform alongside it.
Strengths
- Four registries — AI systems, models, MCP servers and a master agent registry that pulls agents from Azure AI Foundry, Bedrock, Vertex, Salesforce and ServiceNow into one list.
- One OpenAI-compatible gateway enforcing guardrails, RBAC, budgets and logging on every LLM, MCP and A2A call.
- Action Capsule: kernel-enforced sandboxing for agents, MCP servers and private models, with per-task credentials and a kill switch.
Limits
- No dedicated evaluation or red-teaming suite — teams pair Kosmoy with a specialist evals tool.
- The agent builder covers governed internal use cases; dedicated agent-development platforms go deeper.
- No free or self-service tier — procurement runs through an enterprise sales process.
Portkey
AI gateway & LLM-ops control planeBest gateway-native FinOps for developer-led teams
Portkey is an AI gateway and control plane for production AI — one API to 1,600+ models across 45+ providers, with observability, guardrails, prompt management and MCP/agent access control — acquired by Palo Alto Networks in May 2026.
Portkey does FinOps from inside the data path: because it is the gateway, its 21+ request metrics, per-key budgets and rate limits do not just report spend — they stop it, with hard enforcement per key and workspace and OpenTelemetry export for the rest of the stack (observability docs). For platform teams that want the overspending call refused rather than logged, this is FinOps with teeth, on a deployment ladder from MIT-licensed open source to air-gapped.
The open question is ownership: Palo Alto Networks completed its acquisition of Portkey on May 29, 2026 (press release), folding the gateway into Prisma AIRS, and the public docs changelog stops at April 2026. It also documents no EU AI Act, ISO/IEC 42001 or NIST AI RMF cost-evidence tooling as of July 15, 2026.
Strengths
- Category-leading gateway breadth: one OpenAI-compatible API to 250+ LLMs and 1,600+ models across 45+ providers, with retries, fallbacks, load balancing and caching (gateway repo, MIT, ~12.4k stars).
- Deep LLM observability and FinOps: full request logging, 21+ metrics, per-key budgets and rate limits, OpenTelemetry and data-lake export (observability docs).
- A sovereignty ladder rare among gateways: open-source self-host, hybrid VPC data plane, and a documented fully air-gapped enterprise deployment (self-hosting docs).
Limits
- Does not document EU AI Act, ISO/IEC 42001 or NIST AI RMF evidence generation or AI risk classification as of July 15, 2026 (checked the enterprise-offering and feature-comparison docs).
- Inventory and governance cover only assets routed through the gateway — no discovery of AI systems or agents outside it.
- No first-class evals or red-teaming product, and no agent sandboxing or kill switch documented.
LiteLLM
Open-source LLM proxy & AI gatewayBest OSS-first budget enforcement
LiteLLM is BerriAI's open-source proxy and Python SDK that puts 100+ LLM providers behind one OpenAI-compatible API — with spend tracking, guardrails, MCP and A2A gateways, and an enterprise license that adds SSO, RBAC and audit logs on the same self-hosted deployment.
LiteLLM is the open-source default for teams that want budgets enforced without a SaaS bill: an MIT core across 100+ providers with spend tracking and budgets attachable at every level from organization to team to key, plus rate limits, all running on your own infrastructure (GitHub). The enterprise tier is a license key on your own deployment, so cost data never leaves your environment, air-gapped operation included.
The trade-offs are operational: you run the Postgres, Redis, upgrades and on-call yourself; enterprise pricing is quote-only; and the FinOps view is enforcement-first rather than an optimization suite — no unit economics, commitment purchasing or cross-cloud waste analysis, and no compliance evidence.
Strengths
- The de-facto standard open-source LLM gateway: ~53.6k GitHub stars, ~9.8k forks and weekly stable releases, fronting 100+ providers behind one OpenAI-compatible API (BerriAI/litellm).
- Deep FinOps for LLM traffic: budgets and spend attribution per organization, team, project, key and tag, soft-budget alerts, Prometheus and OpenTelemetry metrics, and tool-call tracing since Logs v2 (January 2026) (enterprise docs).
- The most mature MCP-gateway story among OSS gateways: an MCP server registry with per-server access groups, OAuth 2.0 including On-Behalf-Of, and controls over which MCP servers are exposed to the public internet (MCP deployment docs).
Limits
- Does not document EU AI Act, ISO/IEC 42001 or NIST AI RMF mapping, risk classification or compliance-evidence packs as of July 15, 2026; audit capability is gateway admin-action logs plus log export.
- No pre-deployment testing, evaluation or red-teaming offering for customer models and applications.
- No shadow-AI discovery: it cannot see or inventory AI usage that does not flow through the proxy.
Datadog LLM Observability
LLM/agent observability within a general-purpose APM platformBest for teams already on Datadog
Datadog LLM Observability — increasingly framed by Datadog as agent observability — adds LLM/agent tracing, token-cost tracking and evaluations to the Datadog platform, with AI Guard supplying runtime AI security.
If Datadog already runs your monitoring, its LLM Observability is the lowest-friction cost view here: token and cost dashboards correlated with APM, infrastructure and RUM in one place, and the AI Agents Console (Preview) tracks coding-agent spend across the organization. Its AI Guard can block at runtime, which pulls it partway toward the data-path family, though its cost reporting is SDK-instrumented rather than gateway-enforced.
It is SaaS-only — telemetry must flow to Datadog — cost tracking reports rather than enforces budgets, and standalone list pricing is opaque: the official page publishes no per-span rates as of July 15, 2026.
Strengths
- LLM and agent telemetry correlated with full-stack APM, infrastructure, RUM and security data in one platform (product page) — a correlation story no observability specialist can match.
- AI Guard adds genuine runtime blocking — prompt-injection and jailbreak protection, tool-call protection and sensitive-data exfiltration prevention — rare among observability vendors (AI Guard docs).
- The AI Agents Console (Preview) tracks org-wide usage, spend and impact of third-party coding agents such as Claude Code, Cursor and GitHub Copilot (docs).
Limits
- No self-hosted or customer-VPC deployment: telemetry must flow to Datadog's SaaS, which rules it out for strict sovereignty or air-gapped requirements.
- No org-wide AI system registry or shadow-AI discovery beyond coding-agent usage monitoring, and the AI Agents Console is still in Preview as of July 15, 2026.
- Standalone LLM Observability list pricing is opaque: the official page publishes no per-span rates, and third-party sources report conflicting figures and a May 2026 repricing.
Vantage
Cloud cost management / FinOps platform (multi-cloud, SaaS and AI/LLM spend visibility, allocation and optimization)Best broad multi-provider cost visibility with a free start
Vantage is a SaaS FinOps platform that gives unified cost visibility, allocation/chargeback, budgets and anomaly detection across cloud providers, SaaS tools and AI/LLM providers such as OpenAI, Anthropic and Databricks.
Vantage is the accessible generalist: unified cost across AWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes and SaaS with 20+ integrations, and first-class AI/LLM spend tracking that ingests provider usage — OpenAI, Anthropic, Databricks and others — into the same dashboards, budgets and anomaly alerts as the cloud bill (AI cost tooling). Virtual tagging maps spend to business dimensions without engineering tickets, Autopilot automates commitment purchasing, and a free Starter tier plus marketplace availability make it easy to adopt (pricing).
It is a cost tool, not a control plane: no runtime gateway, no guardrails, no agent containment, and 'inventory' means which providers incur spend rather than an AI-system registry. It is SaaS-only with no self-hosted option, and SOC 2 covers Vantage's own service, not AI-governance evidence, as of July 15, 2026.
Strengths
- Broad, unified cost visibility spanning cloud (AWS/Azure/GCP/Kubernetes), SaaS and AI/LLM providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, Databricks, Anyscale, Cursor) with 20+ native integrations (best AI cost management tools).
- First-class AI/LLM spend tracking that ingests provider usage (e.g. Anthropic via the Admin API) into the same dashboards, budgets, allocation and anomaly detection as cloud bills (Anthropic integration).
- Strong FinOps allocation: virtual tagging for showback/chargeback without engineering tickets, hierarchical budgets and real-time anomaly alerts to Slack, Teams or email (best cloud cost management tools 2026).
Limits
- It is a cost/FinOps tool, not an AI governance or control plane: no runtime gateway, guardrails (PII/toxicity/prompt-injection) or agent containment are documented as of July 15, 2026.
- No AI-system/model/agent/MCP-server registry or shadow-AI discovery as of July 15, 2026; 'inventory' is limited to which AI providers and services incur spend.
- No AI-governance compliance tooling (EU AI Act / ISO 42001 / NIST AI RMF) as of July 15, 2026; SOC 2 covers Vantage's own service only.
CloudZero
Cloud cost intelligence / FinOps platform with AI/LLM cost allocation (self-described 'financial control plane' for AI spend)Best pure-FinOps AI cost attribution and unit economics
CloudZero is a SaaS cloud cost-intelligence and FinOps platform that ingests cloud, SaaS and AI/LLM spend and allocates it to unit-economics dimensions (cost per customer, product, feature, model and token) so teams can measure and optimize AI and cloud ROI.
CloudZero is the deepest pure-FinOps attribution on this page. Its allocation engine attributes close to all cloud and AI spend to unit-economics dimensions — cost per customer, feature, product, model, inference and token — without relying on tags, and its AI cost intelligence captures usage call-by-call in real time rather than waiting for the monthly invoice. Its May 2026 relaunch as a 'Financial Control Plane for AI' added AI outcome/ROI attribution (press release, unit economics guide).
Read the label carefully: CloudZero's 'control plane' is financial, not a runtime traffic or policy plane — it captures telemetry for attribution but does not sit inline to block a request. It is SaaS-only with no self-hosted option, has no free tier and no fixed public pricing (quote-based, tied to managed spend with minimums that exclude smaller footprints), and provides no EU AI Act / ISO 42001 / NIST AI RMF evidence beyond its own SOC 1/SOC 2 as of July 15, 2026.
Strengths
- Differentiated cost-per-unit allocation: attributes close to 100% of cloud and AI spend to customers, products and features without relying on tags, exposing cost per customer, per feature and per product (cloud unit economics).
- Deep AI/LLM cost intelligence: token-level, model-aware allocation (cost per model, inference, token and user) across 50+ LLMs and providers (AI cost optimization at scale).
- Real-time, call-by-call telemetry capture of AI usage rather than waiting for the monthly invoice, preserving business context for attribution (financial control plane launch).
Limits
- Not an AI governance or control plane: no runtime gateway, guardrails, agent containment or policy enforcement on LLM/MCP/agent traffic is documented as of July 15, 2026 — the 'financial control plane' terminology refers to cost/ROI, not traffic or safety control.
- No AI security or shadow-AI detection and no AI-specific compliance evidence (EU AI Act / ISO 42001 / NIST AI RMF) as of July 15, 2026; SOC 1/SOC 2 cover only CloudZero's own service.
- No evals, testing or red-teaming and no agent-building framework as of July 15, 2026; AI tooling is limited to querying cost data via existing coding agents.
Questions buyers ask
What is the difference between AI FinOps and LLM observability?
AI FinOps manages spend: token-level cost attribution, budgets, forecasts, chargeback and optimization. LLM observability manages behavior: traces, latency, evaluation and quality. They overlap because both read the same request data, but the buyer and the deliverable differ — a FinOps owner wants a cost-per-team number and an enforced budget; an engineer wants a trace and an eval score. This guide covers the cost side; the tracing and evaluation side is in our separate observability comparison.
Which AI FinOps tool is best at actually controlling costs, not just tracking them?
A gateway. Vantage and CloudZero attribute and optimize spend with more depth than anyone else here, but they read billing data — they can alert on an overspend, not prevent the request. Portkey, LiteLLM and Kosmoy sit in the request path and enforce budgets per key or team, so the call that would breach a limit is refused. If your requirement is a hard brake rather than a report, shortlist a gateway; if it is deep cross-cloud optimization, shortlist a cost platform. Many teams run both.
Are Vantage or CloudZero better than Kosmoy for AI cost management?
For pure cost optimization, often yes. CloudZero's cost-per-customer/feature/model unit economics and Vantage's multi-provider breadth and commitment automation go deeper than Kosmoy's cost tracking, and both cover cloud spend well beyond AI. Kosmoy wins a narrower, specific segment: budgets enforced in the model request path, tied to a registered AI system with an owner and a risk tier, feeding audit evidence — and running in your own infrastructure. Regulated buyers who need enforcement plus evidence shortlist Kosmoy; FinOps teams optimizing a large cloud estate shortlist the cost platforms.
Can I run a cost platform and Kosmoy together?
Yes, and it is a coherent split. A cost platform such as Vantage or CloudZero gives the wide-angle optimization view across cloud, SaaS and AI; Kosmoy enforces per-team and per-app budgets at the gateway and ties every AI cost record to an owner, a risk tier and compliance evidence. The cost tool tells you where the money went and how to spend less; the gateway decides, in real time, what a given team or application may spend. Neither replaces the other.
Do AI FinOps platforms help with EU AI Act compliance?
Mostly no. Vantage, CloudZero and Datadog hold SOC 2 (and in CloudZero's case SOC 1) for their own service, but a chargeback report is not AI-governance evidence, and none document EU AI Act, ISO/IEC 42001 or NIST AI RMF tooling as of July 15, 2026. Kosmoy is the exception on this page: its cost records share an event log with its compliance bundles, so the same data answers the finance and the audit question. Note the timeline — after the May 2026 Digital Omnibus, high-risk EU AI Act obligations land in December 2027 and August 2028, while Article 50 transparency obligations still applied from August 2, 2026.
What does an AI FinOps platform cost?
A wide range. Free entry points exist (Vantage's Starter tier, LiteLLM's OSS self-host); Portkey has self-serve tiers; and CloudZero and Kosmoy are enterprise quote-only, with CloudZero priced as a percentage of managed spend and minimums that make it a poor fit below roughly $1M annual cloud spend. Link out to each vendor's pricing page rather than trusting third-party figures — several publish no list rates. Two costs hide off the price list: operating a self-hosted gateway yourself, and buying a second tool when your one tool only reports or only enforces.
Methodology
Each vendor was scored on the ten capability axes used across Kosmoy's comparison pages, from primary sources — vendor documentation, pricing pages, engineering blogs and repositories — checked on July 15, 2026 and cited inline or in each vendor's profile. On this page we weight the five FinOps-relevant axes above. Scores of 10 are reserved for categorical architectural facts; a specialist always outscores Kosmoy on its own spoke, which is why Vantage and CloudZero both beat Kosmoy on cost/FinOps observability here.
Numbers from vendors appear as attributed claims with citations, never as our measurements. Pricing is linked, not paraphrased, because several vendors publish no list rates: Vantage's exact tier figures could not be confirmed against the live pricing page, and CloudZero and Kosmoy are quote-only. Gaps are phrased 'does not document X as of July 15, 2026', which is a claim about documentation, not proof a capability cannot exist.
Disclosure: Kosmoy publishes this guide. The mitigation is structural — Kosmoy wins exactly one of the four buyer picks, the pure-FinOps tools take the optimization segments outright, and the rubric concedes plainly that a cost dashboard from Vantage or CloudZero attributes and optimizes spend more deeply than a gateway does. Ownership changes that bear on a recommendation — Palo Alto Networks acquiring Portkey — are flagged where they matter.
Sources
Every factual claim about another vendor on this page traces to that vendor's own published material or a named third-party source below.
- Portkey observability docs (budgets, metrics, OTel export) — accessed July 15, 2026
- Palo Alto Networks completes acquisition of Portkey (May 29, 2026) — accessed July 15, 2026
- LiteLLM (MIT gateway, budgets and spend tracking) — accessed July 15, 2026
- Datadog AI Guard docs — accessed July 15, 2026
- Vantage — best AI cost management tools (AI provider coverage) — accessed July 15, 2026
- Vantage pricing — accessed July 15, 2026
- CloudZero launches the Financial Control Plane for AI (May 28, 2026) — accessed July 15, 2026
- CloudZero — Cloud Unit Economics 2026 guide — accessed July 15, 2026
- Kosmoy cost tracking — accessed July 15, 2026
- Kosmoy Platform — accessed July 15, 2026
- Kosmoy AI Gateway — accessed July 15, 2026
- Kosmoy Action Capsule — accessed July 15, 2026
- Kosmoy AI Compliance — accessed July 15, 2026
- Portkey open-source gateway repository — accessed July 15, 2026
- Portkey docs — what is Portkey — accessed July 15, 2026
- Portkey docs — plan & feature comparison (SaaS / hybrid / air-gapped) — accessed July 15, 2026
- Portkey docs — guardrails — accessed July 15, 2026
- Portkey docs — MCP gateway — accessed July 15, 2026
- Portkey pricing — accessed July 15, 2026
- LiteLLM README (100+ providers, MCP/A2A, performance claims) — accessed July 15, 2026
- LiteLLM enterprise docs (features, SLAs, air-gap, pricing by quote) — accessed July 15, 2026
- LiteLLM release notes index (2026 releases) — accessed July 15, 2026
- Rust migration announcement (issue #31263, June 25, 2026) — accessed July 15, 2026
- Guardrail policy templates (incl. offline/air-gapped mode) — accessed July 15, 2026
- MCP deployment docs (registry, exposure controls, air-gap guidance) — accessed July 15, 2026
- litellm-agent-runtime (per-session VM coding-agent runtime) — accessed July 15, 2026
- Datadog LLM Observability product page — accessed July 15, 2026
- AI Agents Console docs — accessed July 15, 2026
- Datadog press release — agentic AI monitoring, LLM Experiments, AI Agents Console — accessed July 15, 2026
- Datadog LLM Observability pricing — accessed July 15, 2026
- AI Guard launch blog — accessed July 15, 2026
- Vantage homepage (product overview) — accessed July 15, 2026
- Anthropic cost integration — accessed July 15, 2026
- Best Cloud Cost Management Tools 2026 (features, SOC 2, RBAC) — accessed July 15, 2026
- Announcing the Vantage MCP Server — accessed July 15, 2026
- Introducing the Vantage FinOps Agent — accessed July 15, 2026
- CloudZero, the AI ROI Company, launches Financial Control Plane for AI (PR Newswire) — accessed July 15, 2026
- CloudZero launches Claude Code plugin (AI Hub) — accessed July 15, 2026
- CloudZero blog — AI cost management (2026) — accessed July 15, 2026
- CloudZero blog — AI cost optimization at scale (50+ LLMs) — accessed July 15, 2026
- CloudZero docs — Security overview (deployment/SOC) — accessed July 15, 2026
- CloudZero pricing page — accessed July 15, 2026
Shortlisting for a regulated environment?
Kosmoy puts an inventory, a policy gateway and a containment sandbox around every AI your teams run — in your own Kubernetes.
Or email sales@kosmoy.com.