Why AI Needs a “Meter”: Inside Kosmoy’s Vision for Responsible Enterprise Adoption AI Systems
- Umberto Malesci
- 27 minutes ago
- 5 min read
In the last few years, artificial intelligence has moved from experiment to infrastructure. Many executives now describe AI not as a single tool, but as the next electricity of business: an invisible layer that powers processes, decisions, and customer experiences across the entire organization. Yet, just like electricity, AI raises a crucial question for companies of all sizes: how do you measure, control, and fairly distribute such a powerful resource inside your business?
A recent article in Corriere della Sera explored this shift through the lens of Kosmoy, an Italian platform that wants to become, quite literally, the “AI meter” for enterprises. Building on those insights, this article looks at why an AI “meter” is emerging as a critical piece of infrastructure, and what it means for governance, compliance, and day‑to‑day operations.

From AI Experiments to AI Infrastructure
For a long time, AI lived in the realm of pilots and proofs of concept. Individual teams tried out chatbots, recommendation engines, or internal copilots, often disconnected from a broader strategy. Today, that scattered approach is no longer sustainable.
As AI systems permeate marketing, operations, HR, customer service, and finance, leaders face three simultaneous pressures:
- The need to scale AI across the organization, not just in isolated pilots.
- The obligation to manage risks: data privacy, model bias, hallucinations, and security.
- The expectation to demonstrate ROI and transparency to boards, regulators, and stakeholders.
This is precisely where the analogy with electricity becomes helpful. When electricity first entered factories, it was a novelty; over time it became a shared utility that needed metering, allocation, and cost control. AI is now following a similar path.
Why an “AI Meter” Is Becoming Necessary
If AI is a shared resource, then companies need a way to understand who is using it, for what, and with which impact. Without a meter, AI remains a black box: powerful, but opaque.
An AI “meter” or meter addresses several concrete needs:
- Visibility: tracking AI usage across departments, tools, and workflows, so leaders can see where value is created and where risks may emerge.
- Allocation: distributing AI capacity fairly across teams, projects, or subsidiaries, based on priorities and budgets.
- Governance: enforcing rules on what data can be used, which models are allowed, and under which conditions.
- Accountability: documenting how decisions supported by AI were made, and which systems contributed to them.
The Corriere della Sera article highlights Kosmoy as one of the platforms positioning itself exactly in this space, bringing the concept of “metering” to the world of AI.
Kosmoy: Turning AI into a Measurable, Governed Utility
Kosmoy, as presented by Corriere della Sera, is built around a simple but powerful idea: AI should become an internal utility that companies can measure, govern, and distribute with the same clarity they apply to other strategic resources. Instead of letting each team adopt its own tools in isolation, Kosmoy proposes a centralized layer for managing AI usage.
While the technical implementation is complex, the core pillars of this approach can be summarized as:
- A unified gateway to different AI models and services, so companies are not locked into a single vendor.
- A metering system that tracks consumption by user, team, or application.
- Governance rules that define who can do what, with which data, and within which limits.
- Reporting and dashboards for leadership, connecting AI usage to business outcomes.
In practice, this means that a company can plug multiple AI capabilities into Kosmoy and then monitor how those capabilities are used across departments, just as it would do with cloud resources or software licenses.
Governance and Compliance: Beyond the Hype
The more AI spreads inside organizations, the more governance becomes a strategic advantage rather than a bureaucratic burden. Regulations such as the EU AI Act and evolving privacy frameworks are pushing companies to document how AI systems are deployed, which data they process, and what safeguards are in place.
Platforms like Kosmoy aim to respond to this environment by providing:
- Centralized policy management for AI usage.
- Audit trails that show when and how AI systems were invoked.
- Controls to prevent misuse of sensitive data or unauthorized models.
- Tools to align AI initiatives with internal compliance teams and external regulators.
As the Corriere piece suggests, the real value here is not just technical; it is organizational. When AI is visible, measurable, and accountable, it becomes easier for boards and executives to support ambitious projects without fear of losing control.
Impact on Different Types of Companies
The need for an AI meter cuts across company size and industry, but the challenges differ.
- Large enterprises: They often have dozens of AI initiatives running in parallel, across regions and business units. For them, a metering layer is essential to avoid duplication, shadow IT, and compliance gaps.
- Mid‑sized companies: They may lack the internal resources to build their own governance stack. Platforms like Kosmoy can provide ready‑made controls and visibility, accelerating adoption while containing risk.
- Scale‑ups and digital natives: For these organizations, AI is often embedded from day one. A meter helps them maintain discipline as they grow, especially when investor scrutiny and regulatory expectations increase.
In each case, the common thread is clear: the era of unmanaged, ad‑hoc AI experiments is closing, and a more structured, measured approach is taking its place.
From Tools to Ecosystems: The Role of Platforms Like Kosmoy
The Corriere della Sera article positions Kosmoy not just as a single product, but as part of an emerging ecosystem of platforms that sit between companies and the rapidly evolving AI landscape. This intermediary layer is becoming crucial for several reasons:
- The model space is fragmenting: new models, vendors, and use cases appear constantly.
- Security and data residency requirements vary by country and sector.
- Business teams want easy‑to‑use AI interfaces, while IT and compliance teams demand control.
By acting as an AI “meter” and control plane, Kosmoy’s approach helps reconcile these competing needs. Business users gain access to powerful AI tools, while the organization retains governance and transparency.
What This Means for Your AI Strategy
For organizations designing their AI roadmap, the message is clear: it is no longer enough to ask “Which model should we use?”. The more strategic question is “How do we manage AI as a shared, measurable resource across the company?”.
Taking inspiration from the discussion in Corriere della Sera about Kosmoy, there are a few practical implications:
- Treat AI as infrastructure, not as isolated tools.
- Invest early in metering, governance, and transparency.
- Ensure business, IT, and compliance teams collaborate on AI policies.
- Consider platforms that provide a central layer for AI access, measurement, and control.
Companies that make this shift now will be better positioned to scale AI safely, align with emerging regulation, and turn experimentation into sustained competitive advantage.


